From time to time, I have written about porn. Usually, it’s when I’m feeling somehow frustrated in my 3D sex life. Or just dead/in need of enlivening. Right now, I’m multiply frustrated. First, foremost, because I have COVID and, as such, kinda feel like shit. I’m definitely improving – woke up with no fever today, and only a mild headache, but my body still feels a bit like a truck ran back and forth over it repeatedly overnight, and the second line on my rapid test filled in almost the moment I squoze the snot solution into the little magic cartridge.
In the back of my mind, for a while, I’ve had two sort of complementary fantasies: one, a film, or series of films, that I would cast and direct, and in which I would star. The other, a porn mega-site that I would direct. When I ponder each of these, I often find myself getting distracted by the more business-y side of things, but that’s not what I’m interested in here, or what’s hot. So I want to, um, flesh out both of those fantasies.
N’s porn megasite
There’s no single porn site that touches all my bases. I’ve written little “reviews” of porn sites, and described my general porn-surfing habits over the years, and they’ve changed a bit. A bit. Not much. But just to review: I want to start by flagging what I particularly like about various sites:
MetArt
MetArt is the parent site of a whole family of sites, several of which I’ll mention here. MetArt, though, is the flagship. As of this writing, they claim to have 4,043 models, and not a little of the hotness of what they present simply is volume. Every day they post four new sets, and every two or three days, one of those sets is a video instead of a photoshoot. The women are, uniformly, beautiful. Natural. And artfully presented. [I’m not, here, taking on the things I don’t like about the site, but there’s lots there, as well, which I’ll address in my ultimate fantasy site design.] Generally (but not always), the women are presented progressing from some form of clothed-ness to full nudity. I like that progression. The quality of the photography is first-rate.
These two screenshots give a feel for what I most enjoy about MetArt:
MetArt X
Another in the family, this adds a layer of explicit (solo) sexuality to it. Where MetArt features beauty, it doesn’t feature sexuality. At least not explicitly. MetArtX takes the MetArt model and adds masturbation/orgasms to it. A fine addition, IMO. The aesthetic, generally, is right up my alley – lots of beauty, lots of teasing, lots of panties.
This gives you a pretty good idea of everything good MetArtX has to offer – it’s a trailer of a spectacularly hot session of adult actor Carolina Sweets getting herself off…. [Here too, I won’t enumerate what I don’t like, although there’s some of that. Rather, I’ll leave the correction of all that for my later description of my take on all this….] And, fwiw, in the real video? She starts in denim shorts. About the hottest thing ever.
SexArt
This is the last in the series from the MetArt family that I like. They have a bunch of other sites, too, but the others don’t really do it for me the way MetArt, MetArtX, and SexArt do. SexArt has a lot of the same virtues (and a lot of the same models) of MetArt and MetArtX, but where MetArtX features masturbation, SexArt features full-on sex. Usually, artfully presented in a sort of word-free ostensible mini-narrative that – as I love – features a progression from clothed to nude, from not sexual to sexual. Often times, in a serial format: like, a series of films about a group of folks on a ski holiday.
Here’s a still from one of those ski holiday movies – maybe my favorite ever of theirs. It features an 8-person orgy – three men and four women all having sex together (well, really, three women and one man, and two men and one woman) while the eighth (woman) plays with herself, watching. It all starts with them playing games, having conversation, and reading, and things escalate deliciously.
Endnote: If you’ve been paying attention, SexArt has a lot in common with the now-essentially-defunct X-Art, a once-great studio that became something very different. I don’t remember where I read this, but… I remember reading that the business model of the folks at X-Art shifted from that of creating porn to that of blackmailing home porn pirates and taking their money, by threatening expensive litigation.
OnlyAllSites
Now we leave the MetArt family (Russia, I believe), and travel to the “OnlyAllSites” family of sites. This is a British suite of sites, and it has a completely different approach to that of MetArt – its closest analogue in that previous bunch. Where MetArt features beautiful, nubile, young women, with natural faces and bodies (airbushed?) close to perfection, OAS features women of many ages (from, say, 20 or so, up to 45 or so) and body types. More silicone than I’d like, more tattoos, more piercings, but also, more humanity. All of which, at the end of the day, I like. And at OAS, they don’t invest so much in the quality of the photography but, instead, invest in the models’ outfits. Here, the focus is on the clothes ON the women, even more than on the women out of the clothes. One of my favorite models on their web site, “Abigail G,” although she once posed topless, hasn’t shown her nipples in years. But she’s one of their most prolific models. Here is a selection from one of her recent shoots – I show you the first, least explicit, and the final, most explicit, shot with a few along the way, to give you a sense of the site’s style:
And the OAS family of web sites is diverse: they have a site called “Only Sportswear” and another, “Only Costumes.” And “Only Silk and Satin.” It’s all a bit much, but you get the point.
And my final inspirational site:
AmateurAllure
AmateurAllure has had a schtick – a simple schtick – forever. And man, do they do it well. The schtick? Beautiful women, dressed elegantly, well lit, shot well, introduce themselves briefly, then suck cock, then get fucked. That’s it. No pretense. Nothing else. Just beautiful cocksucking and fucking.
This is their first page of their model listing:
And then, just to give you a little more of a flavor, this is the trailer for the video of Adria Rae hyped in the photo at the right end of the row above.
My tweaks on all the above
So MY web site would be a bit of a hybrid of all of these. I’ve made a mini-mock-up of it, because, hey, I’ve got COVID and nothing else do to (and can’t really sustain the focus on anything other than this at the moment)….
I like the various conceits – solo model with the focus on a beautiful, solo model in (and to greater or lesser extent, out of) a variety of outfits; solo model with the focus on solo pleasure; sex in a plot-driven context, and solo fellatrix model with the focus on beauty; So on my web site, there would be some of each. And a little more.
For a moment, I fantasized about making a mock-up of my dream porn site, but that’s too much work. I think, instead, I’ll just leave it here. With a little bit of a postscript….
Postscript
There’s a family of web sites – Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, Slayed, Tushy Raw, and Blacked Raw. They have stellar production values. Beautiful actors. And hot sex. Unfortunately, their organizing conceits (women having strap-on sex with one another on Slayed; anal sex on Tushy and Tushy raw; racist tropes of interracial sex on Blacked and Blacked Raw) – other than that of Vixen (beautiful people having sex) – don’t really speak to me. I was thinking, the other day, I might enjoy it if they put together a web site that depicts sex like I like to have it, that depicts relationships of the sort I have – dominance, instruction, teasing. Role-playing. FUN! I think that, in the end, is what I don’t like about all these sites: they aren’t… playful. So maybe that’s what I’m longing for? Playful porn that isn’t silly?