Feb 282014
 

Hyacinth and I have, to my knowledge, the only two blogs with “dissolute” in their title. (Don’t tell me I’m wrong, please. I like believing that.)

We started blogging at around the same time, and though she currently is monogamous, and her boyfriend (“the Neighbor”) only just found out about her blog, we have a lot in common, particularly with respect to our basic sensibilities and tastes. Not sexually – intellectually, intellisexually. We share a frustration at the sex blog landscape, and even more, at the sex blog curatorial landscape.

This isn’t to take anything away from some of the great efforts out there to make sense of the panoply of sexually oriented web sites – Rori and Molly all have done good individual work in compiling lists of blogs and ranking them in some form or fashion. Kinkly has started its own effort in recent months. Jane’s Guide offers thoughtful, opinionated, if dated, reviews. I like all these efforts, and I’m grateful to have been included in each of them at one time or another.

But each has one or both of two characteristics I’m not crazy about: opacity, a lack of clarity as to how they’re compiled, how entries are ranked; and over-inclusiveness, a tendency to include web sites that are visually hideous, poorly written, or simply not blogs about sex (i.e., sex toy reviews).

I have nothing against sex toy reviews, or blogs with painfully distracting layouts, or misspellings and grammatical errors in every post. I just don’t want to read them.

I offer, Hy offers, a few other folks out there (look at my blogroll for a few) offer something different. And/but I find it challenging to discover consistently interesting writing on the topics of sex, sexuality, and relationships, presented articulately, attractively, professionally.

For this reason, we are launching “The two dissolutes.” Once a month, each of us will present to you one smart, interesting, hot, thought-provoking post we think, on the basis of your enjoying our blogs, you might appreciate our calling to your attention. We’ll offer a little blurb about the post, setting the stage for you, explaining what moved us about it. And we will each react to the other’s selection, and thoughts.

We also will compile a sort of joint blogroll, a discriminating list of our favorite blogs. We don’t mean to “compete” with any of the other lists out there, but rather, to do something new, different.

If you see (or write) a blog you think we should know about, please tell us in the comments either here or on Hy’s blog. If you like what we’re doing, tell us. If you have suggestions as to how we might improve, please tell us.

And check back early next week for our first entry.

(A caveat: Hy is self-professedly lame at following through on projects like this. I’ve threatened to humiliate her publicly if she fails to follow through, and, while this is a far more compelling project to me with her, I reserve the right to post with or without her, should she neglect the commitment she’s made to do this with me. She may need a little encouragement from you in this regard as well.)

  5 Responses to “Our dissolute list means…”

  1. Two of my absolute favorite writers combining forces? YES PLEASE.

  2. I like both of your blogs, I think you both know that. You’re the reason why I started to write.
    I understand completely what you’re saying about sex toy blogs (not nearly as interesting to me either) or poorly written posts. That’s one of the reasons why I enjoy reading yours so much: both of you write in such a way that it’s pleasant and easy to read, even for a non-native speaker like me. And thought-provoking. It is tiring to read posts with too many grammatical errors. Maybe even more so because I read a language that isn’t my own?
    However, I have to admit that what I enjoy most in posts is what is being discussed, and the openness with which it is. For that, I am willing to overlook a few grammatical errors…
    (and I must admit, I am grateful for all those people willing to look past the imperfections of my words and still take the time to read and/or comment on what I write).
    Then, as you stated a few times, there is the fact that these are blogs, raw expressions of our innermost thoughts. And often only proof read once before hitting the publish button.
    All this to say that I’m sure I’ll enjoy reading whatever it is that you present to us, as I’m assured of its quality. I’m just hoping that you won’t be too harsh in the selection process. (and no, I’m not saying this for myself!).
    As for mentioning blogs to you… Either Hy or you know already of all the ones I enjoy 😉
    PS: I don’t think I spend as much time choosing my words and checking their spelling for my posts as I did for this comment. Maybe I should 😉

  3. […] Likes and I have joined forces to bring to our readers two new (to us) sex writers each month, two new dissolutes, if you will – ha!  The catalyst for this project was a shared sense that our circles were […]

  4. […] Likes and I have joined forces to bring to our readers two new (to us) sex writers each month, two new dissolutes, if you will – ha!  The catalyst for this project was a shared sense that our circles were […]

Say something! (I just did....)